From multiple interactions to measurable impact

No. Ushur sits upstream of both. Your system of record and your reporting stack keep doing what they do — Ushur addresses the problem before data reaches them, by collecting it consistently from every organization and individual in the first place. A warehouse can only reconcile what it's given; standardizing at the point of capture is what removes the reconciliation.

No, and that's deliberate. Each organization is engaged on the channels it already uses, with no portal account to create and no software to install. What comes back is structured and validated against your program's definitions, so you gain consistency across every funded organization without asking any of them to change how they operate internally.

Behavioral health data carries obligations beyond standard PHI, including consent and disclosure rules specific to substance use records. Ushur handles PII under enterprise-grade controls, with role-based access, configurable guardrails enforced as agents operate, and a complete record of every interaction. Program-specific requirements — what may be collected, retained, and shared, and with whose consent — are configured with your compliance team before anything goes live.

Tribal entities are engaged as organizations in their own right, not as a subset of a county or provider group. Reporting relationships, data-sharing terms, and what is visible to whom are configured per organization — so participation doesn't require a tribal entity to route its data through another authority or accept a single statewide arrangement it hasn't agreed to.

Because validation happens during the conversation rather than after it. Missing fields are asked for, values are checked as they're entered, documents are captured and read at the moment they're submitted, and follow-up happens automatically when something is incomplete. The difference is between chasing an incomplete record weeks later and never creating one.

Fair comparison depends on consistent inputs, which is the first thing this changes: the same questions, asked the same way, validated the same way, across every organization you fund. That makes it possible to see which organizations fall below expectations and which ones set the standard — on like-for-like data rather than on whoever reports most diligently.